(#xghlsva) @prologic@twtxt.net how about hashing a combination of nick/timestamp, or url/timestamp only, and not the twtxt content? On edit those will not change, so no breaking of threads. I know, I know, just adding noise here. :-P

(#i6qqvqq) @david@collantes.us Cool idea actually! The hash would also be shorter than the raw URL and timestamp.

(#i6qqvqq) @movq@www.uninformativ.de Right. That’s why, I’d bite the bullet and go for huge URLs. :-)

I havent’t looked at the code and I’m too lazy right now, does jenny also verify the fetched result against the hash?

(#i6qqvqq) @movq@www.uninformativ.de Ah, cool. :-)