Search

Twts matching tag=opev6mq

@prologic@twtxt.net (#opev6mq) Spoofing is always possible, and always a concern (don’t we “deal” with it already for the url field?).

For the side-question, the feature is nice but depends on availability, and trust, I’m more interested in adversarial interoperability. What if I’m moving from a pod because I dislike their new policies, or new terms of service, their monetization model, etc.? And what guarantees do we have that every pod (or even yarn implementation) will have the redirect option available to its users?


#ahdl23q

@prologic@twtxt.net (#opev6mq) I see reasons for allowing absolute URIs, and see no reason not to.

I suppose I should condense this thread into a write-up proposing the change, explaining why, and proposing client behaviors (“how to deal with a prev pointing to an absolute URI”). But that takes time, and I don’t know when will I reserve some to sit down and actually do the proposal :-)


#k2mxfnq