(#m7o5dpa) @prologic@twtxt.net I can agree on JSX and similar but I must say that arrow functions, classes and so on are quite nice once you get used to them.

I too ended up wanting less and less but exactly for that reason I really enjoy those new stuff the platform offers natively.

Anyway, I’ll keep your style as much as I can. 👍

(#pv7ouaq) @prologic@twtxt.net No problem! 👍

I can understand your reasoning and i know the pure syntax is not the only part involved when developing in general.

I guess when a programming language changes a lot it’s much harder to adapt and break habits.

Having a clear idea of what you expect from your code and language is a lifesaver when working with many people, ever more in open source projects like yarn.

Keep it up! 💪😎

(#pv7ouaq) @prologic@twtxt.net Yeah, I was planning to try it myself in the future, there’s seems to be lot of other Python developers that made the switch for the same reason.

I prefer working on the frontend the most, but I’ll surely get my hands on it sooner or later. 😎

(#pv7ouaq) @prologic@twtxt.net I love most of the modern Javascript syntax, including arrow functions (this doesn’t include JSX, which is not Javascript and I hate it 🙈) but I do agree that terseness can go too far to the point of getting in the way of readability – definitely an issue with Python IMO. Honestly the only good thing about Python in my opinion is the ecosystem, particularly for data science.
I do like Go from my very limited experience with it; I will definitely be using it more.

(#pv7ouaq) @caesar@twtxt.net Yeah, I’ll probably be making some kind of toy project in Go to test it out and see how it fit me when empty handed. 😏